Management during the war period in the context of social resilience and sustainable development of communities in Zaporizhzhia region

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/2025-3/33-05

Keywords:

crisis management, early recovery, social resilience and community cohesion, sustainable development, public administration, internally displaced persons (IDPs), digitalization, martial law, regional recovery, Zaporizhzhia region

Abstract

The article examines management during wartime as a strategically important tool for ensuring social resilience and sustainable development of communities, using Zaporizhzhia region as a case study. The relevance of the topic is determined by the unprecedented challenges caused by the full-scale invasion, manifested in the destruction of infrastructure, mass population displacement, humanitarian crises, and the transformation of the local self-government system. Under conditions of high uncertainty and constant threats, communities are forced to implement crisis and flexible management models that combine early recovery and anti-crisis measures with a focus on long-term reconstruction and development.

The purpose of the study is to substantiate the role of management in shaping the resilience of communities in Zaporizhzhia region, to analyze practices of early recovery, crisis management, and integration of internally displaced persons, as well as to identify prospects for sustainable development of the region in the post-war period. To achieve this goal, a set of methods was applied: analysis of official reports and scholarly sources to determine key management problems; a systemic approach to reveal the interconnection between management decisions, socio-economic processes, and the level of community resilience; comparative analysis methods to assess the effectiveness of management models and identify best practices.

The study concludes that effective governance in wartime is based on flexibility, recognition and consideration of cascading risks under strategic uncertainty, the ability to adapt quickly to changes, and maintaining a balance between urgent population needs and long-term recovery prospects. The key factors of community resilience are identified as: adaptability, social cohesion, digitalization of management processes, involvement of civil society, support for internally displaced persons, coordination with international organizations, and the development of post-war recovery strategies. The practical significance of the results lies in the possibility of applying the experience of Zaporizhzhia region by state authorities, local governments, and international partners in developing recovery policies and implementing sustainable development models for regions in crisis and post-crisis conditions.

JEL Classification: H12, H70, O18, Q01, R58

References

1. Bondarenko S., Ivanov D., Koval V. Risk management strategies for SaaS implementation in unstable business environments: Evidence from Ukrainian logistics sector. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management. 2024. 27(2), 156–174.

2. Brown A., Davis M. Predictive analytics for load balancing in cloud-based logistics platforms: A performance optimization study. Journal of Cloud Computing. 2023. 12(3). Art. 47.

3. Chen L., Wang Y., Zhang H. Digital transformation in supply chain management: The role of SaaS platforms in operational efficiency. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2023. 28(4), 721–738.

4. García R., Wilson P. Integrated management models for SaaS solutions in logistics: A systems approach. Information Systems Management. 2023. 40(2), 142–159.

5. Іваненко О. П., Петров М. С. Цифрова трансформація логістичних систем в умовах невизначеності. Економіка і суспільство. 2023. Вип. 47, С. 112–128.

6. Johnson K., Martinez C. Taxonomy of recovery strategies for mission-critical logistics systems: A comprehensive framework. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing. 2023. 16(3), 1842–1855.

7. Коваленко В. М. Стратегії цифровізації логістичних компаній: український контекст. Вісник економічної науки України. 2023. № 1, С. 78–92.

8. Kovalenko O., Petrov S. Barriers to cloud technology adoption in Ukrainian logistics companies: An empirical investigation. Eastern European Business Review. 2023. 11(2), 89–106.

9. Kumar S., Singh R. SaaS adoption in logistics: Drivers, challenges, and performance outcomes. International Journal of Production Economics. 2022. 245. Art. 108397.

10. Lee J., Park S., Kim H. Integration of recovery strategies with operational processes in logistics systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2022. 174. Art. 108792.

11. Мельник Т. А., Григоренко С. В. Управління ризиками в логістичних системах: методологічні аспекти. Проблеми економіки. 2024. № 2, С. 234–248.

12. Miller T., Anderson J., Roberts K. Performance optimization factors in real-time tracking systems: A comprehensive analysis. Transportation Research Part E. 2022. 168. Art. 102943.

13. Nakamura H., Tanaka Y. Dynamic evaluation models for SaaS optimization strategies using machine learning approaches. Expert Systems with Applications. 2023. 216. Art. 119471.

14. Park J., Kim D. The role of organizational culture in successful implementation of optimization strategies: Evidence from logistics sector. Journal of Business Research. 2022. 149, 832–845.

15. Petrenko A., Kovalenko N. Reliability challenges in Ukrainian logistics tracking systems: Current state and improvement strategies. Logistics Research. 2023. 16(1). Art. 23.

16. Roberts M., Taylor S. Comprehensive methodology for evaluating recovery and optimization strategies effectiveness in logistics. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2024. 44(1), 178–201.

17. Rodriguez F., Chen X., Kumar A. Adaptive resource management in SaaS platforms for logistics operations. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2024. 141, 234–248.

18. Шевченко Л. С., Іваненко В. О. Вплив воєнного стану на розвиток логістичної інфраструктури України. Економічний вісник. 2023. № 3, С. 156–171.

19. Thompson R., Anderson L. Geographic data redundancy models for disaster recovery in logistics systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 2024. 233. Art. 109124.

20. Wang Q., Liu J., Chen K. Three-dimensional efficiency framework for SaaS platforms in logistics: Reliability, scalability, and adaptability. Decision Support Systems. 2023. 167. Art. 113923.

21. Zhang W., Li M., Sun Y. Adaptive backup strategies based on data criticality and system load in logistics platforms. Information Sciences. 2023. 622, 892–910.

REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)

Bondarenko, S., Ivanov, D., & Koval, V. (2024). Risk management strategies for SaaS implementation in unstable business environments: Evidence from Ukrainian logistics sector. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 27(2), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2024.135891

Brown, A., & Davis, M. (2023). Predictive analytics for load balancing in cloud-based logistics platforms: A performance optimization study. Journal of Cloud Computing, 12(3), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-023-00421-5

Chen, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2023). Digital transformation in supply chain management: The role of SaaS platforms in operational efficiency. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 28(4), 721-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-09-2022-0358

García, R., & Wilson, P. (2023). Integrated management models for SaaS solutions in logistics: A systems approach. Information Systems Management, 40(2), 142-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2023.2196745

Ivancnko, O. P., & Petrov, M. S. (2023). Tsyfrova transformatsiia lohistychnykh system v umovakh nevyznachenosti [Digital transformation of logistics systems under uncertainty]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, (47), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-47-15

Johnson, K., & Martinez, C. (2023). Taxonomy of recovery strategies for mission-critical logistics systems: A comprehensive framework. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 16(3), 1842-1855. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2023.3241567

Kovalenko, O., & Petrov, S. (2023). Barriers to cloud technology adoption in Ukrainian logistics companies: An empirical investigation. Eastern European Business Review, 11(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-023-00247-2

Kovalenko, V. M. (2023). Stratehii tsyfrovizatsii lohistychnykh kompanii: ukrainskyi kontekst [Digitalization strategies of logistics companies: Ukrainian context]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, (1), 78-92.

Kumar, S., & Singh, R. (2022). SaaS adoption in logistics: Drivers, challenges, and performance outcomes. International Journal of Production Economics, 245, Article 108397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108397

Lee, J., Park, S., & Kim, H. (2022). Integration of recovery strategies with operational processes in logistics systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 174, Article 108792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108792

Melnyk, T. A., & Hryhorenko, S. V. (2024). Upravlinnia ryzykamy v lohistychnykh systemakh: metodolohichni aspekty [Risk management in logistics systems: methodological aspects]. Problemy ekonomiky, (2), 234-248.

Miller, T., Anderson, J., & Roberts, K. (2022). Performance optimization factors in real-time tracking systems: A comprehensive analysis. Transportation Research Part E, 168, Article 102943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2022.102943

Nakamura, H., & Tanaka, Y. (2023). Dynamic evaluation models for SaaS optimization strategies using machine learning approaches. Expert Systems with Applications, 216, Article 119471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119471

Park, J., & Kim, D. (2022). The role of organizational culture in successful implementation of optimization strategies: Evidence from logistics sector. Journal of Business Research, 149, 832-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.068

Petrenko, A., & Kovalenko, N. (2023). Reliability challenges in Ukrainian logistics tracking systems: Current state and improvement strategies. Logistics Research, 16(1), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-023-00523-7

Roberts, M., & Taylor, S. (2024). Comprehensive methodology for evaluating recovery and optimization strategies effectiveness in logistics. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(1), 178-201. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2023-0621

Rodriguez, F., Chen, X., & Kumar, A. (2024). Adaptive resource management in SaaS platforms for logistics operations. Future Generation Computer Systems, 141, 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.11.028

Shevchenko, L. S., & Ivanenko, V. O. (2023). Vplyv voiennoho stanu na rozvytok lohistychnoi infrastruktury Ukrainy [Impact of martial law on the development of logistics infrastructure in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk, (3), 156-171.

Thompson, R., & Anderson, L. (2024). Geographic data redundancy models for disaster recovery in logistics systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 233, Article 109124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109124

Wang, Q., Liu, J., & Chen, K. (2023). Three-dimensional efficiency framework for SaaS platforms in logistics: Reliability, scalability, and adaptability. Decision Support Systems, 167, Article 113923. https://doi.org/10.1y016/j.dss.2023.113923

Zhang, W., Li, M., & Sun, Y. (2023). Adaptive backup strategies based on data criticality and system load in logistics platforms. Information Sciences, 622, 892-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.12.001

Published

2025-10-20

How to Cite

Arabadzhyiev, D. and Sergiienko, T. (2025) “Management during the war period in the context of social resilience and sustainable development of communities in Zaporizhzhia region”, Management and Entrepreneurship: Trends of Development, 3(33), pp. 60–72. doi:10.26661/2522-1566/2025-3/33-05.