Strategies of organizational development of entrepreneurial activity in global environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/2025-3/33-11Keywords:
entrepreneurial activity, organizational development, strategies, strategic management, global environmentAbstract
The relevance of the topic is due to the fact that in conditions of high uncertainty, increased global competition and rapid transformation, there is a need to form strategies that will ensure long-term sustainability.
The purpose of the research is to theoretically substantiate and practically analyze strategies for organizational development of business activities in the global environment.
The research was carried out on the basis of a comprehensive methodological approach, which involves a combination of theoretical analysis and empirical research. At the theoretical stage of the study, a systematic analysis of scientific literature was conducted that highlight the issues of strategic management of organizational development of business activities. The empirical stage of the study involved the use of questionnaires among business entities, which made it possible to identify practical features of the implementation of organizational development strategies for business activities and assess their effectiveness. SWOT analysis allowed assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the strategic organizational development of business entities. At the final stage, the results of theoretical and empirical analysis were generalized and integrated, which made it possible to formulate practical recommendations for their implementation and assess the impact of strategies on the competitiveness and sustainability of enterprises.
As a result of the research, the role of organizational development of entrepreneurial activity in strategic management was clarified, innovative approaches to the formation of organizational development strategies of entrepreneurial activity and the classification of organizational development strategies were systematized, and practical recommendations for the implementation of organizational development strategies of entrepreneurial activity were provided. The scientific novelty of the reseach lies in the complex combination of theoretical justification and practical assessment of organizational development strategies of entrepreneurial activity.
JEL Classification: L29, M21, O20
References
Barney, J. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–56. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/259392
Blank, S. (2013). Why the Lean Start-Up Changes Everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72. Available at https://hbr.org/2013/05/why-the-lean-start-up-changes-everything (last accessed: 03.06.2025).
Burke, W.W. & Litwin, G.H. (1992). A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change, Journal of Management, 18(3), 523–545. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800306
Gudz, O.E. & Muzychenko, A.L. (2020). Organizational development of the enterprise. Economics. Management. Business, 4(34), 8-12. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31673/2415-8089.2020.0400812 [in Ukrainian].
Khan, S., Fatma, N., Ali, S. S., Dhamija, A. & Naqvi, D. (2024). Analysing the Barriers of Strategic Entrepreneurship: A DEMATEL Approach. Sustainability, 16(11), 4599. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114599
Korobka, S.V. (2021). Managing the organizational development of a small enterprise. Scientific perspective: economics and management, 3(73), 28-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32836/2521-666X/2021-73-4 [in Ukrainian].
Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 187 p. Available at https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/6e5efd05/files/uploaded/Leading%20Change.pdf (last accessed: 03.06.2025).
Krajcsak, Z. & Bakacsi, G. (2025). The three levels of organizational change to build future potential organizations. International Journal of Innovation Science, 17 (3), 630–649. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2023-0173
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management. New York: Free Press, 406 p. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259760377_Strategy_Safari_A_Guided_Tour
_Through_The_Wilds_of_Strategic_Management (last accessed: 05.06.2025).
O’Reilly, C. A. &Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2285704
Parkhomenko, N.O. (2020). Comparative characteristics of organizational development strategies of business systems in a global environment. Business Inform, 11, 385–392. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-11-385-392 [in Ukrainian].
Plotnikova, M.F. & Yakovenko, O.S. (2024). Theoretical aspects of the formation of a strategy for the development of entrepreneurial activity in construction. Economy and society, 59. Doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-59-125 [in Ukrainian].
Sarasvathy, S.D. (2001). Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2). 243–263. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378020
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1998). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Waterman, R.H., Peters, T.J. & Phillips, J.R. (1980). Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 23(3), 14–26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(80)90027-0
СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ
1. Barney, J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
2. Barney, J. Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research. Academy of Management Review, 2001, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 41–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259392.
3. Blank, S. Why the Lean Start-Up Changes Everything. Harvard Business Review, 2013, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 63–72. Available at: https://hbr.org/2013/05/why-the-lean-start-up-changes-everything (accessed 03 June 2025).
4. Burke, W. W., Litwin, G. H. A Causal Model of Organizational Performance and Change. Journal of Management, 1992, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 523–545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800306.
5. Khan, S., Fatma, N., Ali, S. S., Dhamija, A., Naqvi, D. Analysing the Barriers of Strategic Entrepreneurship: A DEMATEL Approach. Sustainability, 2024, vol. 16, no. 11, 4599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114599.
6. Kotter, J. P. Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1996. 187 p. Available at: https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/6e5efd05/files/uploaded/Leading%20Change.pdf (accessed 03 June 2025).
7. Krajcsak, Z., Bakacsi, G. The three levels of organizational change to build future potential organizations. International Journal of Innovation Science, 2025, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 630–649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2023-0173.
8. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J. Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour through the Wilds of Strategic Management. New York: Free Press, 1998. 406 p. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259760377_Strategy_Safari_A_Guided_Tour
_Through_The_Wilds_of_Strategic_Management (accessed 05 June 2025).
9. O’Reilly, C. A., Tushman, M. L. Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 324–338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2285704.
10. Sarasvathy, S. D. Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from Economic Inevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency. Academy of Management Review, 2001, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 243–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4378020.
11. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 509–533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z.
12. Waterman, R. H., Peters, T. J., Phillips, J. R. Structure is not organization. Business Horizons, 1980, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 14–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(80)90027-0.
13. Гудзь, О. Є., Музиченко, А. Л. Організаційний розвиток підприємства. Економіка. Менеджмент. Бізнес, 2020, № 4(34), с. 8–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31673/2415-8089.2020.0400812.
14. Коробка, С. В. Управління організаційним розвитком малого підприємства. Науковий погляд: економіка та управління, 2021, № 3(73), с. 28–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32836/2521-666X/2021-73-4.
15. Пархоменко, Н. О. Порівняльна характеристика стратегій організаційного розвитку бізнес-систем в умовах глобального середовища. Бізнес Інформ, 2020, № 11, с. 385–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-11-385-392.
16. Плотнікова, М. Ф., Яковенко, О. С. Теоретичні аспекти формування стратегії розвитку підприємницької діяльності у будівництві. Економіка та суспільство, 2024, № 59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2024-59-125.
