Methods for assessing livestock products competitiveness under economic challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/2024-2/28-01Keywords:
economic challenges, competitiveness, methods for assessing, assessment, livestock productsAbstract
The article is devoted to the formation of new scientific solutions regarding the development of methods for assessing Ukrainian livestock product competitiveness in world, international, and national sales markets, considering the impact of economic challenges. It has been emphasized that Ukrainian livestock enterprises have errors in assessing the competitiveness of products (CP) and identifying the strengths and weaknesses of their own competitive position in the world, international, and national sales markets due to the lack of adequate methods of evaluating CP. The article aims to develop a methodology for assessing Ukrainian livestock product competitiveness in world, international, and national sales markets, taking into account the impact of economic challenges. Methodology: a set of general and special methods has been used at the empirical and theoretical levels. It includes historical and comparative assessments to evaluate the competitiveness of Ukrainian livestock products in the world market, comparison – to form requirements for the modern method of assessing livestock products competitiveness of (CLP) on world, international, and national sales markets, taking into account the impact of economic challenges; logical generalization and scientific abstraction – to determine the key components of the methodology recommended for assessing Ukrainian livestock products competitiveness in national, international, and world sales markets; analysis and synthesis – to characterize the group blocks of CLP assessment methodology; methods of systematization, grouping, and logical generalization for information systematization, formation of conclusions and scientific proposals of the article. The article uses system-functional, historical, and systemic approaches to reveal and solve the problems of developing a methodology for assessing Ukrainian livestock product competitiveness in world, international, and national sales markets, taking into account the impact of economic challenges. Results: methods for assessing Ukrainian livestock product competitiveness have been developed, taking into account the impact of economic challenges on the CLP.
JEL Classification: О13, Q10
References
Fuior E., Zavatki T., Maxim I. (2019). Сompetitiveness of the enterprise: the essence and methods of evaluation. Тhe yearbook of the «GH. ZANE» institute of economic researches, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research (from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH). 2019, Vol. 28(1), рр. 33-50.
Liučvaitienė A., Peleckis K., Slavinskaitė N., Limba T. (2013). Theoretical Models of Business Competitiveness : Formation and Evaluation. Strategic Management Quarterly, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 1, рр. 31-44.
Long Y. (2021). Export competitiveness of agricultural products and agricultural sustainability in China. Regional Sustainability, Vol. 2, Issue 3, рр 203-210.
Bojnec S. (2003). Three Concepts of Competitiveness Measures for Livestock Production in Central and Eastern Europe. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, Vol 68, No. 3, рр. 209-220.
Bakai V.I., Linnik D.V. (2021). Peculiarities of determining and assessing the competitiveness of the company's products. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Ekonomichni nauky, № 6, Vol. 1, рр. 272-279. [in Ukrainian].
Stepankova A.A. (2012). Methods of evaluating the competitiveness of products. Efektyvna ekonomika, № 2. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=954 (Accessed 28 May 2024). [in Ukrainian].
Kucher S.F., Vasyliev V.H. (2017). Competitiveness of products and methods of its assessment. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy, № 16, рр. 60-63. [in Ukrainian].
Lysenko N. (2007). Methods of evaluating the competitiveness of products of meat processing enterprises. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, №1 (77), рр. 61-68. [in Ukrainian].
Zaritska N.M. (2015). Evaluation of the competitiveness of the company's products. Efektyvna ekonomika, № 12. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4647 (Accessed 28 May 2024). [in Ukrainian].
OECD (2017). Green Growth Indicators 2017. Paris : OECD Publishing. Available at: 10.1787/9789264268586-en (Accessed 28 May 2024).
United Nations Environment Programme (2012). Measuring Progress towards an Inclusive Green economy. Available at: https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/references/measuring-progress-towards-an-inclusive-green-economy-unep-2012.pdf (Accessed 28 May 2024).
Statistics Poland (2022). Green economy indicators in Poland. Warsaw : CSO. Available at: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/environment-energy/environment/green-economy-indicators-in-poland-2022,3,5.html (Accessed 28 May 2024).
GGGI (2023). The Global Green Economy Index. Available at: https://greengrowthindex.gggi.org (Accessed 28 May 2024).
The Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE) (2023). Green Economy Progress (GEP). Available at: https://archive.un-page.org/green-economy-progress-measurement-framework (Accessed 28 May 2024).
СПИСОК ВИКОРИСТАНИХ ДЖЕРЕЛ
1. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Livestock and Poultry : World Markets and Trade. 2023. URL: https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/73666448x?locale=en&page=5#release-items (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
2. Fuior E., Zavatki T., Maxim I. Сompetitiveness of the enterprise: the essence and methods of evaluation. Тhe yearbook of the «GH. ZANE» institute of economic researches, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research (from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH). 2019. Vol. 28(1). Рр. 33-50.
3. Liučvaitienė A., Peleckis K., Slavinskaitė N., Limba T. Theoretical Models of Business Competitiveness : Formation and Evaluation. Strategic Management Quarterly. 2013. Vol. 1. No. 1. Рр. 31-44.
4. Long Y. Export competitiveness of agricultural products and agricultural sustainability in China. Regional Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 2. Issue 3. Рр 203-210.
5. Bojnec S. Three Concepts of Competitiveness Measures for Livestock Production in Central and Eastern Europe. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus. 2003. Vol. 68. No. 3. Рр. 209-220.
6. Бакай В.Й., Ліннік Д.В. Особливості визначення та оцінки конкурентоспроможності продукції підприємства. Вісник Хмельницького національного університету. Економічні науки. 2021. № 6. Том 1. С. 272-279.
7. Степанкова А.А. Методи оцінки конкурентоспроможності продукції. Ефективна економіка. 2012. № 2. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=954 (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
8. Кучер С.Ф., Васильєв В.Г. Конкурентоспроможність продукції та методи її оцінки. Причорноморські економічні студії. Економіка та управління підприємствами. 2017. № 16. С. 60-63.
9. Лисенко Н. Методи оцінки конкурентоспроможності продукції м‘ясопереробних підприємств. Актуальні проблеми економіки. 2007. №1 (77). С.61-68.
10. Заріцька Н.М. Оцінка конкурентоспроможності продукції підприємства. Ефективна економіка. 2015. № 12. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4647 (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
11. OECD. Green Growth Indicators 2017. Paris : OECD Publishing, 2017. URL: 10.1787/9789264268586-en (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
12. United Nations Environment Programme. Measuring Progress towards an Inclusive Green economy. 2012. URL: https://www.gwp.org/globalassets/global/toolbox/references/measuring-progress-towards-an-inclusive-green-economy-unep-2012.pdf (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
13. Statistics Poland. Green economy indicators in Poland. Warsaw : CSO, 2022. URL: https://stat.gov.pl/en/topics/environment-energy/environment/green-economy-indicators-in-poland-2022,3,5.html (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
14. GGGI. The Global Green Economy Index. 2023. URL: https://greengrowthindex.gggi.org (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
15. The Partnership for Action on Green Economy (PAGE). Green Economy Progress (GEP). 2023. URL: https://archive.un-page.org/green-economy-progress-measurement-framework (дата звернення: 28.05.2024).
