Системний огляд сучасних методик якісних досліджень

Автор(и)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26661/2522-1566/2022-4/22-03

Ключові слова:

гібридні методи, дослідження менеджменту, якісні дослідження, Skype, соціальні мобільні пристрої (SMD), VOIP, телеконференції

Анотація

Згідно з багатьма визначеннями, якісне дослідження передбачає значний міжособистісний контакт. Протягом усього процесу якісного дослідження, від стратегії до впровадження, ефективна комунікація є важливою. Незважаючи на те, що за останні кілька десятиліть з’явилися численні нові якісні дослідницькі інструменти, ті, що пов’язані з комунікаційними технологіями, виявилися найбільш важливими та впливовими. Оскільки доступної інформації про комунікаційні технології в якісних дослідженнях мало, ця стаття має на меті зробити огляд нових технологій, які зараз використовуються. Для цього автор проаналізував кілька літературних джерел з якісних досліджень. Як стало відомо з літератури, якісні дослідження досягли нових висот за допомогою сучасних методів. Тому якісні дослідники повинні бути в курсі останніх технологічних досягнень, щоб отримати максимальну продуктивність.

JEL Classification: А10, А12.

Посилання

Anderson, T., & Kanuka, H. (1997). Online forums: new platforms for professional development and group collaboration. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(3).

Arnould, EJ, and Wallendorf, M. (1994), “Market-oriented ethnography: interpretation building and marketing strategy formulation,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 484-504.

Barnard, C. (1938), The Functions of The Executive, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Beddall-Hill, N., Jabbar, A., & Al Shehri, S. (2011). Social, mobile devices as tools for qualitative research in education: iPhones and iPads in ethnography, interviewing, and design-based research. Journal of the Research Centre for Educational Technology, 7(1), 67-90.

Belk, R.W. and Kozinets, R.V. (2005), “Videography in marketing and consumer research,” Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 128-141.

Bloor, M., Frankland, J., Thomas, M., & Robson, K. (2001). Focus groups in social research. London, UK: Sage.

Bonoma, T.V. (1985), “Case research in marketing: opportunities, problems and a process,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 199-208.

Borghini, S., Caru`, A. and Cova, B. (2010), “Representing B to B reality in case study research: challenges and new opportunities,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 16-24.

Bowler, G.M. Jr (2010), “Netnography: a method specifically designed to study cultures and communities online,” The Qualitative Report, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 1270-1275.

Branthwaite, A. and Patterson, S. (2011), “The power of qualitative research in the era of social media,” Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 430-440.

Brocklesby, J. (1997), “Becoming multimethodology literate: an assessment of the cognitive difficulties of working across paradigms,” in Mingers, J. and Gill, A. (Eds), Multimethodology. The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 189-216.

Bruneau E. G., & Saxe, R. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 855-866.

Callaghan, J., Barber, H., Cusik, C., & Buchanan, K. (2010). Chatting online: The use of instant messaging in qualitative research. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the British Psychological Society Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section (QMiP) Conference, University of Nottingham, UK.

Capra, F. (2002), The Hidden Connections, HarperCollins, London.

Caru`, A. and Cova`, B. (2008), “Small versus big stories in framing consumption experiences,” Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 166-176.

Caru`, A. and Cova`, B. (2011), Marketing e competenze dei consumatori, Egea, Milano.

Cayla, J. and Arnould, E. (2013), “Ethnographic stories for market learning,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 77 No. 4, pp. 1-16.

Cook, C. (2012). Email interviewing: Generating data with a vulnerable population. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(6), 1330-1339.

Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crompvoets, S. (2010). Using online qualitative research methods in medical education. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4(3), 206-213.

Davis, D.F., Golicic, S.L. and Boerstler, CN (2011), “Benefits and challenges of various methods research in marketing,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 467-479.

Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds) (1994), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Dubois, A. and Gadde, L.-E. (2002), “Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55 No. 7, pp. 553-560.

Easton, G. (2010), “Critical realism in case study research,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 16-24.

Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), “Building theories from case study research,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532-550.

Evans, A., Elford, J., & Wiggins, D. (2008). Using the internet for qualitative research. In C. Willig & R. W. Stainton (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 315-333). London, UK: Sage.

Finn, J. (1999). An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. Health and Social Work, 24, 220-231.

Germann, F., Lillien, G. and Rangaswamy, A. (2013), “Performance implications of deploying marketing analytics,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 114-128.

Gibbs, G. R., Friese, S., & Mangabeira, W. C. (2002). The use of new technology in qualitative research. Introduction to Issue 3(2) of FQS [35 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Art. 8.

Gill, J. and Johnson, P. (1991), Research Methods for Managers, Paul Chapman Publishing, London.

Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago, IL.

Guercini, S. (2004), “Developing the researcher-manager interface in the case analysis process,” Management Decision, Vol. 42 Nos 3/4, pp. 464-472.

Guldberg, K., & Mackness, J. (2009). Foundations of communities of practice: Enablers and barriers to participation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 528-538.

Gummesson, E. (2000), Qualitative Methods in Management Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA

Gummesson, E. (2006), “Qualitative research in management: addressing complexity, context, and persona,” Management Decision, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 167-179.

Hakansson, H. (Ed.) (1982), ˚ International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods. An Interaction Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

Harrison, R.L. and Reilly, T.M. (2011), “Mixed methods designs in marketing research,” Qualitative Market Research, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 7-26.

Hay-Gibson, N. (2009). Interviews via VoIP: Benefits and disadvantages within a Ph.D. study of SMEs. Library and Information Research, 33(105), 39-50.

Hine, C. (2000), Virtual Ethnography, Sage Publication, London.

Holge-Hazelton, B. (2002). The internet: A new field for qualitative inquiry? Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2), Art. 15.

Holt, A. (2010). Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 113-121.

Im, E.-O., & Chee, W. (2006). An online forum as a qualitative research method. Nursing Research, 55(4), 267-273.

Jick, TD (1979), “Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 602-611.

Khourdajie, A. (2008). Marketing for the wireless world. Unpublished individual term paper, MARK1051, University of Greenwich, UK.

King, S. A. (1996). Researching internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2), 119-128.

Kozinets, R.V. (2002), “The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 61-72.

Kozinets, R.V. (2010), Netnography. Doing Ethnographic Research Online, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, and London.

Kuhagen, I. (2013). Leveraging smartphones to capture consumer experiences in the spur of the moment. Think Global Qualitative.

Kuhn, T.S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1990), “A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of the longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites,” Organization Science, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 248-266.

Luders, M. (2004). Instant messenger as an environment for conducting qualitative interviews. Paper presented at Challenges for Research about Online Communities Ph.D. seminar, Roskilde University, Denmark. May 25-26.

Ludwig, S., de Ruyter, K., Friedman, M., Bru¨ggen, E.C., Wetzels, M. and Pfann, G. (2013), “More than words: the influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews of conversation rates,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 77 No. 1, pp. 87-103.

Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2002). Internet interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 603–628). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Manning, P.K. (1979), “Metaphors of the field: varieties of organisational discourse,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 660-671.

Mayan, M. J. (2009). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

McCoyd, J., & Kerson, T. (2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5(3), 389-406.

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Mills, C.W. (1959), The Sociological Imagination, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Mingers, J. and Gill, A. (Eds) (1997), Multimethodology. The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

Mintzberg, H. (1979), “An emerging strategy of ‘direct’ research,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 582-589.

Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and the´oreˆt, A. (1976), “The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 246-275.

Myers, M.D. (2013), Qualitative Research in Business & Management, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Naylor, R.W., Lamberton, C.P. and West, P.M. (2012), “Beyond the ‘like’ button: the impact of mere virtual presence on brand evaluations and purchase intentions in social media settings,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 76, pp. 105-120.

Ogden, J. (n.d.). International telecommunications union (ITU) world telecommunication / ICT indicators database and ITU key indicators 2006-2013, Wikimedia Commons.

Opdenakker, R. (2006). Advantages and disadvantages of four interview techniques in qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 11.

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pettigrew, A.M. (1990), “Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice,” Organization Science, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 267-292.

Pihlanto, P. (1994), “The action-oriented approach and case study method in management studies,” Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 369-382.

Plebe, A. and Emanuele, P. (2006), L’euristica. Come nasce una filosofia, Laterza, Bari.

Pretto, G., & Pocknee, C. (2008). In online project collaboration, we still have a long way to go. Melbourne, Australia: Ascilite.

Robson, K., & Robson, M. (1999). Your place or mine? Ethics, the researcher, and the internet. In T. Welland & L. Pugsley (Eds.), Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research (pp. 94-107). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Sanday, PR (1979), “The ethnographic paradigm(s),” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 527-538.

Saumure, K., & Given, L. (n.d.). Using Skype as a research tool: Lessons learned from qualitative interviews with distance students in a teacher-librarianship program.

Simon, H.A. (1979), “Rational decision making in business organisations,” American Economic Review, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 493-513.

Sridhar, S. and Srinivasan, R. (2012), “Social influence effects in online product ratings,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 70-88.

Steiger, S., & Goritz, A. S. (2006). Using instant messaging for internet-based interviews. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 552-559.

Steinberg, S. (1995). Introduction to communication course book 1: The basics (3rd ed). Cape Town, South Africa: Juta.

Stephens, N. (2007). Collecting data from elites and ultra-elites: Telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 203-216.

Sturges, J. E., & Hanrahan, K. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 107-118.

Tuchman, G. (1994), “Historical, social science: methodologies, methods, and meanings,” in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 306-323.

Van Maanen, J. (1979), “The fact of fiction in organisational ethnography,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 539-550.

Van Maanen, J. (1988), Tales of the field. On Writing Ethnography, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Van’t Hooft, M. (2007). Introduction to special issue on highly mobile computing. Educational Technology, May/June 3-5.

Vidich, A.J. and Lyman, S.M. (1994), “Qualitative methods: their history in sociology and anthropology,” in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 306-323.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1981), “Einfu¨hrung”, in Watzlawick, P. (Ed.), Die erfundene wirklichkeit, R. Piper & Co. Verlag, Munchen.

Walker, D. (2013). The internet as a medium for health service research. Part 1. Nurse Researcher, 20, 18-21.

Waskul, D., & Douglas, M. (1996). Considering the electronic participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of online research. Information Society, 12, 129-139.

Williams, S. G. (2012). The ethics of internet research. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics (OJNI), 16(2).

Witmer, D. F., Colman, R. W., & Katzman, S. L. (1999). From paper and pencil to screen and keyboard. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing internet research (pp. 145-161). London, UK: Sage.

Wolcott, H.F. (1992), “Posturing in qualitative inquiry,” in LeCompte, M.D., Millrow, W.L. and Preissle, J. (Eds), The Handbook of Qualitative Research in Education, Academic Press, London, pp. 3-52.

Woodside, A.G. (2010), Case Study Research: Theory, Methods, and Practice, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley.

Yin, R.K. (1981), “The case study crisis: some answers,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 58-65.

Yin, R.K. (1984), Case Study Research. Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Yin, R.K. (1993), Applications of Case Study Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Yin, R.K.(2005), Introducing the World of Education: A Case Study Reader, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Young, S., Persichitte, K. A., & Tharp, D. D. (1998). Electronic mail interviews: Guidelines for conducting research. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 4(4), 291-299.

Zhang, Q., and Segall, R.S. (2010), “Review of data, text and web mining software,” Kibernetes, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 625-655.

Завантаження

Опубліковано

2022-12-20

Як цитувати

Vivek, R. (2022) “Системний огляд сучасних методик якісних досліджень”, Менеджмент та підприємництво: тренди розвитку, 4(22), pp. 34–49. doi:10.26661/2522-1566/2022-4/22-03.